Send As SMS

2/19/2006

RoKS ROCKED.....

Really. A lot. You're going to wish you were there (or be pretty fucking pleased you were)... Success. All day of sessions, sweet-ass music, 250+ AIESECERS was the final count!!! WOW. LOTS of line dancing, sessions, cool stuff in general, hookah into the wee hours of the morning, YEAH TO MEYERS AND JEFF DAVIS!!! Two of the "baddest....shut yo' mouth" to ever grace an AIESEC conference. =) Of course, where there's Meyers, there's Arnaub....and paired with Williams, I KNOW you're surprised we didn't have any major policy violations. I'd love to write more but I'm going to pretend like I'm studying for my midterm tomorrow. At 9. I've found that in moments like this it's best to go the existentialism route....what is a midterm, really, and why do I need to take it? Will it matter if I fail? What is failing, anyway?..... It makes it a helluva lot easier if you can blame your grades on the unbreakable constraints on perception and sensation imposed by the ineffecuality of language, or the constraints imposed by mere being (or not being) Daoism, anyone? Ok, the below is from Jenna from Madtown. I totally Bonnie-and-Clyde-ed it off her blog because it's sweeeeeeet....

Olny srmat poelpe can...
cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt!

2/15/2006

243 BABY...

That's how many FREAKING people ROWDIE RoKS will be hosting. Oh, yeah, we know you're jealous. =) Sorry for those calling me lately and I haven't been responding--this is a logistical nightmare, and one that's been keeping me quite on the go....
OK, well....no news so far, really. Happy Belated Single Awareness Day.
**me**

2/9/2006

"How does an organization perform well?"

"In the best of times I’ve seen our profits soar and our goal numbers shattered in excess. In the worst of times I’ve seen our accounts frozen in the red and breaches of policy so severe they threatened our future existence. But in it all I’ve seen “us”, because in the end that ownership is what makes the organization work. It’s not a brand name or a process; it’s the individuals. I’ve never felt more alive than in those moments I feel I can change the world through my organization. Those are the moments that fuel me through the good and bad; and the ownership that keeps me coming back for more.

Our organization performs well because the members are passionate. We believe in the mission and believe we are making a difference. People are drawn to us because we create a dynamic environment where everyone is connected and there is a sense of community. We feel we are working toward a common goal, and self-motivation is key. Each person is able to take on more responsibility and express his views while developing his work plan toward our goals.

We aim to deliver high-quality performance in everything we do, and through creativity and innovation seek to continuously improve. We must be consistent and transparent in all actions and decisions, making the basis for those decisions and their effects available on an organization-wide basis because it affects everyone. Good recruitment is essential. We look for people that will work well in our organization and will be dedicated to our reality. With that, we realize that it is important to effectively transition people in and out of our organization, to maintain sustainability and orientation of our members.

Our process is sustainable. We have spent countless hours collaborating in great efforts to ensure we are productive toward our vision and can be sustained in years to come. We consistently review and reflect on our design to ensure it is the best possible structure to encourage our mission and the participation of our members. Once we have agreed on effective measures to reach our goals, we must define the qualifiers that show our progress: numbers, percentages, etc. We concentrate on effective division of labor—with people assigned to teams we work together toward our goal while respecting our strengths and weaknesses. We consistently trouble-shoot and solve possible hang-ups. Our strong IT system keeps our information centralized and easily accessible. Financial stability is a must. We painstakingly ensure we spend economically and maintain a fiscal balance sufficient to fund our progress. Money can make or break our organization, and respect for its power is essential.

We realize our actions affect our performance on the local, national, and international levels of our organization. We feel a responsibility to these relationships and respect the fact that only by working together can move forward. Cooperation between these entities is essential—we consistently give feedback and best case practices through our information systems. Everyone is connected and has a sounding board in their search for improvement. Reputation is always a concern. We are an international brand, and what we do locally speaks for our entire organization. We realize the necessity of supporting one brand, one voice, and within that viewpoint we recognize the need of taking responsibility for our actions. We are the microcosm that the community identifies with our organization in its entirety.

We recognize our strong market position and the demand/supply relationship that must be met. Therefore, we must work with other organizations in local, national, and global networks, and we consistently seek to form and strengthen these relationships. We recognize our legal responsibilities as well as responsibilities to our contracts. We deliver on what we contract for, and breaches of any process or policy are not accepted. We rely on our integrity for our organization to run smoothly. Finally, we understand that our organization and the world in which it works are constantly changing. Transition to these new parameters is essential to help us stay alive and effective throughout the coming years. We are capable of change and modification, and consistently seek to improve."

I was recently asked to answer the above question in a single-spaced, one-page response. It was hard to do. I spent a long time really reviewing what organizations need to focus on in order to perform well, and to remain sustainable. Of course, I took AIESEC as the example. I've never seen the inner-workings of any other organization so clearly, and even though I don't mention the brand name above, I think most of us know who I'm talking about. But I firmly believe in this statement. It might be choppy, and cram alot of grandiose gestures into one space, but when I read it again and again I still think these are the main steps an organization has to take. I know it speaks to my passion and belief in org. structure--if it didn't completely convey that, I never would have written it.

2/8/2006

Some radom quotes from AIESEC interviews...

Potential @er: "So, would you send someone abroad that didn't have specific background [in that country]?"
Me: "Definitely. In fact, I love to send people abroad that don't have background in the country."

Potential @er: (in a 'challenging' voice?) "So, does AIESEC actually have a mission or something? Do you have an actual structure?"
Me: "We contribute to the development of our countries and their people with an overriding commitment to international understanding and co-operation. We exist in over 90 countries world-wide, we've been an established corporation since 1948, and AIESEC US, Inc. has partnered with a consulting group to reach some of the highest standards in org. design you'll see in any Member Committee around the world. Yeah. We have a structure."

Potential @er: "So, what does AIESEC do around campus? I mean, I know what you do internationally, with exchange, but I haven't seen any events or anything."
Me: "That's a question that I'd like answered as well. How do you feel about Event Coordination?"

2/6/2006

april21ish: *sigh* i hate computers. and my lack of knowledge. i don't know how you like them
Greg99orio: they're logical
april21ish: they speak a different language
Greg99orio: i speak computer
april21ish: lol

2/5/2006

When Grey's Anatomy sucks, it ruins my week...

Seriously, Grey's sets the tone for my ENTIRE week. If it sucks, my week will suck. Tonight it was a to-be-continued, which is OH SO APROPOS for this crazy freaking week. So, I have one paper due on Tuesday and two due on Wednesday. All worth 20% of my grade, all 5+ pages. Which, ok, could be fine. Except I haven't written them yet. And I forgot I agreed to do interviews for 2 hours on Monday and Tuesday nights. And I've got a conference call Tuesday night. And I have to work. And there's the whole being OCP RoKS. But MOST importantly, there is the huge issue that I just don't care. Now, all of the above reasons to not write my papers PALE in comparison to lack of sheer interest. I really don't care, and honestly, I don't see how it matters. I already applied to said school (see previous post), and that decision won't change regardless. Anyway, so I'm sitting here SOOOOOOO not wanting to write anything, when I start thinking about my sheer 'love of the game' mentality. It is a fact that I often do things just to see if I can get away with them. Now, true to my personality type, I usually get pretty pissed off if I get caught; elated and slightly disappointed if I manage it. (it's all an attention thing, I'm convinced--youngest child syndrome) It's really about the challenge. Anyway, so in typical fashion the time I waste trying to get around the problem (probably equal to the time of writing the papers) paid off--I realized that two of the papers contain suggested topics that are quite similar. Taught by the same professor, two of my classes have quite a lot of overlap, and thus it hits me: write only one paper, turn it in to both classes. Will this work? Well, in the Arts and Letters class the papers are turned in during lecture, meaning most likely the professor himself will be reading them, while in the Great Books class, papers are turned in directly to the GSIs. Let's figure out my odds. The chances of the professor reading both are relatively slim--if my assumption is correct and the GSIs are grading the papers in the one class, then the papers will only be shown to the prof if an attempt at standardizing is made. In that attempt, there is usually one representative paper of each grade sect, A B C or D. The chances of being the ONE paper within the ONE grade sect are fairly small, and in my favor. In the rare shot that the professor does see my paper twice, once from GSIs and once in his own grading, what are the chances he'll have read them in a close enough time span for him to remember explicit incriminating details? Surely if I can easily blur the lines between two paper topics in his two classes, he must be driven dizzy keeping his consecutive papers and topics straight; add that to nearly 500 combined students, and I've got myself a decent poker hand. Now, it is slightly less exhilarating because the risk is not so great--there's no rule in the book that says one can't turn in a paper twice, given you're actually the author. *sigh* But it does save me work, thus giving me time to outline my considerable psychological quirks in blogger. You know, in high school I used to sign in and out with different secretaries, so every M W F I got 3 hours off and they thought it was a glitch in the paperwork. When they asked me about it I always said I had mentioned it to the other one. Acting like you're supposed to be doing what you're doing is an underrated skill--a self-righteous look opens doors. I had a friend ask me, "Your conscience is a weak, sickly thing, isn't it?" Maybe. But I like the challenge.

2/1/2006

Just noting something hilarious....

So, I'd just like to say it's frickin great that I called Rusty and said, "Rusty, oh my God this is an AIESEC distress call. It's like the batman signal in the sky" and he replied, "I know, I saw it coming out of class. It was the @ symbol in the sky, and it also said A-TEAM DAMN RIGHT, and I was like, Oh shit, I have to get to my phone right away!" LMAO. Seriously. AND, I'd like to quote one of @ MI's newest members, props out to the not-quite-newbie Emily, she knows how it is...."April, I joined AIESEC as a friends-with-benefits relationship. You know, it sounded good, but it was just fun. Now, I'm in a totally exclusive and committed relationship, and I'm a little worried." LOL oh, it's true, it's true. DON'T BE AFRAID OF THE COMMITTMENT, NEWBIES!! LOL AIESEC's taking you through all the bases. ; )

AIESEC, AIESEC, AIESEC...1,2,3, BREAK!!

*Whew* ok. That's how i feel sometimes, and I can't IMAGINE how it is for LCPs (ok, i can, and I'm scared). -_- Meaning that, being SO into the organization and SO eager to do more good work, sometimes I'm just rushing into everything. So then you take a step back, reassure yourself that, "Hey, I can do this" and then, as my Dad would say, you bite the bullet. I may have bitten off a bit more than I can chew, but in an attempt to stop myself from freaking out, I just launched into my personal little AIESEC pep rally. YEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH TEAM!!!!
*whew*